Discuz! Board's Archiver

eghcx0iw3 發表於 2013-5-30 17:49

discount vans shoes not a passenger jet approaching at high speed.

the shots that were later popularized and replayed, you don t see the plane strike the tower, because it was on the other side of the building. I do recall seeing a plane in the background approaching the building, a few seconds earlier,[url=http://www.vanscheapshoesvans0.com]discount vans shoes[/url], and thinking ridiculously, it seems now that I was surprised they d allow a plane fly so close to a burning building. (Because there were no nearby objects to give the plane perspective, I thought it was a smaller plane close up, not a passenger jet approaching at high speed.) And then the fireball burst, and for a second I thought, equally ridiculously, How could a fire in one building set off an explosion in the other one? It s embarrassing now to admit that, but my reaction sums up, for me, what that morning changed: the willingness to believe that there must be a non-nefarious explanation for even the worst tragedy. You can see that naivete go up, literally,[url=http://www.vanscheapshoesvans0.com]Vans Classics Leather N Canvas Era Wingtip Brown[/url], in flames here. (You can hear it, too, in the anchorwoman s voice the touch of horror on Is that what I m witnessing? as she tries to maintain professional detachment.)If you don t need or want to see it, move along, and good for you. Latest from our Partners  Parent Claims Anne Frank Is Too Pornographic For School  The Huffington PostWIth all due respect to DeAnn, and with an acknowledgment that there's something absurd about one blog disagreeing with itself, I'm gonna throw down right here on a subject I've written about in this space several times: The absolute lame-ness and wrong-ness of the "Weeds" opening credits. But first, some mitigating factors: "Weeds" is a very good show that I happen to like a lot. Which is one reason why its opening sequence bugs me so much. Also,[url=http://www.vanscheapshoesvans0.com]Vans LXVI Secant Black Grey[/url], there is something appealing about having a new band (and generally cool ones at that) performing the opening song each week. If only because that's never been done before (I think). And it adds something new and exciting to the start of the show.So much cooler than that stupid, stupid songBeyond that, however, here's what's wrong with the opening sequence: Nearly everything. Let me explain."Little Boxes" itself, as I've previously noted, is one of the absolute worst products of the early '60s folk revival. As composed by Malvina Reynolds, it's a snotty little exercise in pomposity that attempts to reduce a vast population of people -- anyone who lives in a suburban community -- into a pathetic abstraction. They're all the same,[url=http://www.vanscheapshoesvans0.com]Vans TNT 5[/url], all living in crappy little, ill-built houses, all of them with horrid values and rotten educations and doomed children, and "and the boys go into business and marry a raise a family/In boxes made of ticky-tacky, and they're all just the same."This is not just an offensive analysis, but also plainly and obviously stupid. It tells us far more about Ms. Reynolds' own arrogance than it does about suburbanites. (not that I live in, or even particularly LIKE the suburbs myself, mind you) Reynolds -- or at least the narrator of the song -- places herself so far above her subject she can't even be bothered to learn the first thing about them. Instead, she cops to the most simple-minded images she can....a zooming-by-on-the-freeway perspective on the appearance of houses and streets, on the children on the street and a straight-out-of-Life-magazine suspicion of what the fundamental values and concerns of the neighborhood might be. Is any segment of society all just the same? Of course not, which is -- ironically enough -- one of the core ideas behind "Weeds"! Indeed, what makes the show so good is how clearly it sees into the dark (and -- hey, who knew? -- quite diverse and screwy) inner lives of its characters. What was it Tolstoy said about unhappy families? Oh yes, they're all different. And often quite interesting. Hence the joy of watching "Weeds."Though the show goes out of its way to contradict this idea with its awful credit sequence....which basically plays out like a video version of "Little Boxes," with a whole lot of identically dressed suburbanites, all emerging from similar houses, all driving similar cars, all doing precisel
Related articles:


頁: [1]

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.