Discuz! Board's Archiver

tv0ei9cxr6h 發表於 2013-5-30 17:56

lululemon online discount Alabama and Mississippi

row over their science. Already there is a new tone. Researchers are more upfront, open and explicit about their uncertainties, for instance, he said.Tune-in to Ecocentric on Wednesday for coverage of the results of the inquiry.Over at his new blog on the New Republic, Jonathan Cohn—the TNR writer who covered health care like Darrelle Revis on a wide receiver—asks where the public outrage is on the Gulf oil spill:Two months after the Deepwater Horizon rig first exploded, where are the marches on Washington? Where are the phone calls lighting up Capitol Hill switchboards? Congressional staffers I ve contacted tell me constituent contact on climate change has increased in the last few weeks, but only incrementally.Of course there s no shortage of public outrage coming from the places that are most directly affected by the oil spill: the Gulf states of Louisiana,[url=http://www.lululemononsales.com]lululemon online discount[/url], Alabama and Mississippi, and the Florida panhandle. You d be pretty angry if tar balls washed up on your pristine beach. But that s the rage of someone who has been the direct victim of a crime—not the greater political anger Cohn is talking about. (And of course the Gulf states for the most part remain strongly in favor of increased offshore oil exploration.) He s wondering—as many have before him—why the oil spill hasn t kickstarted support for the broader goals of environmentalists, like a cap-and-trade system to fight climate change.Cohn puts some of the blame on President Obama for waiting too long to address global warming—and doing so in a speech that seemed half-hearted—and notes that the Senate requirement for 60 votes presents an enormous hurdle to getting anything done. But he adds that whatever complaints Democrats might have with their leadership, politicians can only go as far as people will push them. Connecting climate change and the oil spill isn t a straight line, and it could be that the public support for action on global warming simply isn t there, even after all these years and solid scientific evidence. Though polls generally say that a solid majority of Americans believe in climate change and want government to do something, the support seems to be broad but not terribly deep—like sloshing water in a pan, as Andrew Revkin puts it. Until that changes—or maybe until someone abolishes the Senate filibuster—it may not matter how many millions of barrels of oil are spilled into the Gulf of Mexico.As the oil spill has worsened, reporters have dug into BP s company policies, demonstrating that the energy company often put profits well before safety throughout many parts of its operations. Exhibit A in that case was always a 2005 fire in BP s creaking Texas City refinery, which killed 15 people—four more than died in the Deepwater Horizon accident. But a new investigation by Ryan Knutson at ProPublica shows in excruciating detail just how careless BP was in the years leading up to the Texas City fire—and why that matters as the company struggles to clean up the Gulf spill:The Texas City disaster has taken on new relevance today,[url=http://www.lululemononsales.com]lululemon outlet locations[/url], because the investigations that were done in its aftermath reveal so much about the company that is responsible for what s happening now in the Gulf. Government probes, court filings and BP s own confidential investigations paint a picture of a company that ignored repeated warnings about the plant s deteriorating condition and instead remained focused on minimizing costs and maximizing profits. According to a safety audit BP conducted just before the 2005 blast, many of the plant s more than 2,[url=http://www.lululemononsales.com]sheer lululemon pants[/url],000 employees arrived at work each day with an exceptional degree of fear of catastrophic incidents. As if that deadly—and avoidable—accident wasn t enough, Knutson found that BP s Texas City refinery had a major release of toxic chemicals into the air in the weeks just before the Deepwater Horizon accident.The company now estimates that 538,000 pounds of chemicals escaped from the refinery while it was replacing the equipment. These included 17,000 pounds of benzene, a known carcinogen; 37,000 pounds of nRelated articles:

  
[url=http://www.muduo.net/ucenter_home/space.php?uid=122854&do=blog&id=686868]http://www.muduo.net/ucenter_home/space.php?uid=122854&do=blog&id=686868[/url]
  
[url=http://girlxoxo.com/reading-and-eating/weekendreading.php#comments]http://girlxoxo.com/reading-and-eating/weekendreading.php#comments[/url]
  
[url=http://www.4u369.www.4u369.com.chemnet.org.tw/viewthread.php?tid=9885&extra=]http://www.4u369.www.4u369.com.chemnet.org.tw/viewthread.php?tid=9885&extra=[/url]

頁: [1]

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.