Discuz! Board's Archiver

el1dixuj78 發表於 2013-5-30 18:53

lululemon apparel as the Wall Street Journal writes

the EPA was able to claim victory when it forced Nalco, the manufacturer of Corexit, to reveal the dispersant s ingredients, which had been largely kept secret for business confidentiality,[url=http://www.lululemononsales.com]lululemon apparel[/url], something that is regularly claimed by chemical companies. Think about that: in the midst of the greatest environmental disaster, the government had to force a company to reveal the ingredients of a chemical being poured into the oceans, and it still took weeks. As I wrote in a long story for TIME earlier this year,[url=http://www.lululemononsales.com]lulu outlet store[/url], we need change in our chemical regulation system:If scientists were slow to arrive at that conclusion, Washington has been even slower. The Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), the 34-year-old vehicle for federal chemical regulation, has generally been a failure. The burden of proving chemicals dangerous falls almost entirely on the government, while industry confidentiality privileges built into the TSCA deny citizens and federal regulators critical information about how substances are made and what their effects are. In the years since the TSCA became law, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has been able to issue restrictions on only a handful of chemicals and has lacked the power to ban even a dangerous carcinogen like asbestos.Until that happens, it ll be mostly bad news for us.A satellite image of developing weather outside the Gulf of MexicoIt doesn t take much to disrupt the jury-rigged system BP has designed to contain some of the oil spewing into the Gulf. Just a few days ago an underwater remote operated vehicle bumped into a venting system, requiring BP to remove the containment cap for about half a day—during which time oil flowed from the well virtually unchecked.But the real fear has been that a tropical storm or hurricane could hit the central Gulf of Mexico, potentially disrupting containment for days and causing havoc onshore. And that s what forecasters are worried could happen next week. A tropical depression is forming in the Caribbean, and forecasters at accuweather.com believe there s a chance it could become a tropical storm or hurricane and enter the Gulf of Mexico by early next week:Meteorologists in the AccuWeather.com Hurricane Center are gearing up for what is likely to be the Atlantic basin s first tropical storm or hurricane over the next several days. Regardless of the track of the feature, there will be some trouble in the oil slick area next week.A zone of disturbed weather in the western Caribbean Sea as of Friday afternoon tracking west-northwestward through the weekend is the focus of most of their attention. Hurricane hunter aircraft are investigating the area of disturbed weather at this time.A northward turn of this feature would be of great concern for oil slick and Katrina anguished areas of the central Gulf Coast.At his press briefing on Friday, Coast Guard Admiral Thad W. Allen that it would take about five days to disconnect the drillship Enterprise—which is processing about 25,000 barrels of oil a day—from the broken well. The Coast Guard would need to carry out the disconnection—and evacuate workers—if forecasts predicted gale force winds in the area. (Gale force winds are 46 miles per hour or greater, which is slightly above the 39 miles per hour wind needed to declare a tropical storm.) A storm of that size would likely force a halt to any surface skimming on the surface of the ocean, or contained burns—two other means to control the growth of the spill, and the two ships drilling relief wells would need to stop and return to port. Between disconnecting the equipment, taking it to port and then reconnecting it over the spill site,[url=http://www.lululemononsales.com]lululemon usa[/url], Allen estimates that the well could be uncapped for two weeks in the case of a storm. That would mean hundreds of thousands of barrels of oil spilling into the Gulf that would have otherwise been captured. Of course, we re watching the story very closely, Allen said.So are meteorologists, and they re worried, as the Wall Street Journal writes:The scientific models show the storm taking a variety of tracks, some away from the wellRelated articles:

  
[url=http://www.j-wpt.com/bbs/home.php?mod=space&uid=531233&do=blog&id=4161678]http://www.j-wpt.com/bbs/home.php?mod=space&uid=531233&do=blog&id=4161678[/url]
  
[url=http://bjsxd.com:8081/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=471478&extra=page%3D1]http://bjsxd.com:8081/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=471478&extra=page%3D1[/url]
  
[url=http://ns.reesun.com/viewthread.php?tid=8127452&extra=page%3D1]http://ns.reesun.com/viewthread.php?tid=8127452&extra=page%3D1[/url]

頁: [1]

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.